Deal origination private equity: how a fund builds one channel properly in 3 years

Deal origination in private equity is treated as an activity and behaves like an investment: sustained spending with no return for a long time, then a return that arrives in a lump and is attributed to something else. That shape is why most origination programmes are abandoned in year two, right before the point at which they start working. This page sets out the four steps of building one channel properly and where funds reliably stop.

Step one: pick a sector narrow enough to be known in

Being the fund that owners in one niche have heard of is achievable. Being known across mid-market industrials is not, for anybody below a few billion. The narrowness feels like it shrinks the opportunity and in practice it is what makes any of the rest possible, because reputation does not distribute across sectors.

Step two: produce something worth reading

Analysis of the sector that an owner in it would find useful, published where they would find it. This is slow, it is not marketing, and it fails when it is written for other investors rather than for operators. The test is whether somebody running one of these businesses would send it to a peer.

Step three: meet people with nothing to sell

Conversations with owners who are not selling, repeatedly, over years. The value is that when they do sell, you are not one of twelve names on a banker's list. It is also the step that is hardest to justify in a quarterly review, because it produces nothing measurable for a long time.

Step four: record all of it, or it did not happen

Who was met, when, what was discussed and who introduced them. Three years of relationship building held in one partner's memory is an asset the fund loses on the day that partner leaves, and it is the single most avoidable loss in the whole business. This is the cheapest step and the most often skipped.

Questions people ask about deal origination private equity

How long does an origination channel take?

About three years to produce reliable proprietary flow, which is why most programmes are abandoned in year two.

How narrow should the sector be?

Narrow enough that owners in it have heard of you. That is much narrower than most funds are comfortable with.

What is the most avoidable mistake?

Not recording the relationships. Three years of work held in one partner's memory leaves with them.

Sources

Related answers

Keep this mandate: start Mandatzo ProStop rebuilding the buyer list: start Pro